
An interesting aspect of my work these days is the opportunity to have conversations with people who hold different perspectives on the question of whether a covenanted same-sex relationship is an appropriate life choice for a disciple of Jesus. In the early years, most of my conversations were with Christians who held to a traditional understanding that sexual intimacy ought to be reserved for the marriage between one man and one woman. At that time, Christians who held an affirming view of same-sex relationships were seen as a very separate group – perhaps perceived by those with whom I was talking as dangerous, not particularly serious about scripture or the Christian faith, or misguided by their emotions. That separateness was not an easy barrier to dismantle with people – mainly because their focus was not on the shared faith in Christ with affirming folks – but on the moral differences in viewing a faithful discipleship journey for gay people.
Fast forward to today, and in the course of any given 24 hour period I might have several conversations with people from very diverse perspectives. In fact, sometimes those conversations happen within minutes of one another. Sometimes, the individuals with whom I’m speaking assume that I share the same perspective they do …. And sometimes they assume that I don’t. When a person’s position is explicitly stated, some degree of “us vs. them” often creeps into the conversation. Sometimes I am assumed to be part of “us” and sometimes I’m assumed to be one of “them”.
My role in these conversations, regardless of the perspective the person holds and regardless of whether they view me as with them or against them, is to be a non-anxious presence. My role is to listen carefully. As I listen, I will hear their expectations – but these are not my focus. Their expectations may be to try to confirm where I stand. Or to influence me. Or to leverage solidarity with their position. But none of these things can be my focus. My focus is to nurture generous patience as I introduce postures of humility and hospitality and grace into the conversation. I am always called to ask, “How now shall we live with those with whom we differ?” And not only how shall we live and relate and walk forward – but how shall we do so in the way of Jesus?
One of the realities of New Direction intentionally choosing to live in the tension of generous spaciousness is that those who hold a traditional view may assume that we are affirming – since we are welcoming into conversation those that hold affirming views. Another reality is that those with affirming views may think we are just being a kinder, gentler version of impeding progress to full inclusion given our openness to those who hold traditional views.
The truth is, this is a really hard place to be. To intentionally situate yourself in the very midst of those who are trying to assert the dominance of their perspective is a very vulnerable place. And I understand that the reason people are seeking to assert the dominance of their perspective is most often because they deeply, truly believe that their position is true, is life-giving, is most representative of the revelation of God through Scripture. And when you intentionally stand in the midst of such passion and intensity, it can easily be seen as some wishy-washy, politically correct effort to forge a false peace and a superficial chorus of kumbiya.
As New Direction seeks to be intentional in living out the model of generous spaciousness, particularly in the diverse make up of our board and staff, it can feel like we are walking in a minefield where even a minor mis-step might just blow up in our face. Our board is, itself, a diverse group who comes together to lead the mission of New Direction in building bridges. Someone with whom I was having initial conversation about participation with our board of directors indicated that while he was intrigued by and even supportive of what we were doing in seeking to diffuse the polarity and nurture peaceful and spacious places – he felt he could never have enough patience to deal with those who held traditional views. Later that afternoon I received an email from a long-time supporter of the ministry who indicated that he wanted his monthly donations stopped immediately and his name taken off the mailing list since, in his estimation, we were no longer preaching the truth. I understand both of these situations and honour each of these individuals’ autonomy to be where they need to be in this broader conversation. But it is hard. Painful to know that some feel betrayed by our stepping into the tensions of generous spaciousness.
At the same time, it has been an incredible learning experience for me to grow into my capacity to be a non-anxious presence. To learn the spiritual and emotional disciplines that enable me to keep my reactions in check and listen for the Spirit’s promptings in each of these kinds of exchanges. To extend grace. To live in robust patience. To trust more deeply that God is in control.
It has been incredible to glimpse moments of breakthrough where the mystery of humility triumphs over arrogant certainty. Where hearts open to experience challenging but important relational growth with those with whom they disagree. To see a pastor’s eyes well up with tears when he says that he used to want to err on the side of orthodoxy, but he now wants to lean on the side of love.
These moments make my sometimes schizophrenic-feeling days matter. These moments make the whip-lash feeling dissipate and I remember that I have been called for such a time as this, to live into the tensions and be that non-anxious presence of peace ….. where God reveals not necessarily the exact right answer to the question of how a gay person ought to relationally live as a disciple of Christ …. but where God reveals his deep and vast and unfathomable love for each one of us, in our different places, doing the best we can to know him, see him, honour him. For in the end, all things are caught up in him. For he is the author and finisher of our faith.
“We have been drawn together by God to be a sign of the resurrection and a sign of unity in this world where there is so much division and inner and outer death. We feel small and weak, but we are gathered together to signify the power of God who transforms death into life. That is our hope, that God is doing the impossible: changing death to life inside of each of us, and that perhaps, through our community, each one of us can be agents in the world of this transformation of brokenness into wholeness, and of death into life.” ~ Jean Vanier, “From Brokenness to Community”
-WG
Wendy, you have just described my life in ministry to a finite detail.
ReplyDeleteI may post your post on my blog for my readers to see that I am not alone in all of this and there are other respectable people who go through the same things I do.
The concern that I find myself facing with the idea of generous spaciousness is that it might create an incorrect perception that all views (and all expressions of those views) are equivalent in terms of how they impact people. To give out one example, I'd like to focus on the question, "Can gay people be Christians?"
ReplyDeleteThe good news is that there has been progress in terms of how that question is answered. A couple decades ago, the most likely answer would have been "no, of course not," quite possibly followed by bemused surprise that anyone would think the question needed to be asked. Nowadays -- and I credit Wendy and many others who are pushing for generous spaciousness as being a major catalyst for the change -- you'll get a variety of answers. In some instances, someone may respond the same way most did in past decades. Others will respond in the affirmative and express equal bemused surprise that people would answer the question any other way. Others may give a more nuanced answer. Some may express sincere uncertainty. I consider that progress.
But the truth is, the fact that the question is asked at all has a deep and often negative impact on LGBT people. The fact that the question is asked at all demonstrates a tendency to look at LGBT people as "other" -- or even just "potentially other" -- and that's not a good thing. (And it's something I believe that Wendy and others who promote generous spaciousness are trying to put an end to -- and I consider that a laudable thing.)
And here's the thing: I suspect you'd be hard pressed to find anyone asking the question "Can people with traditional views of sexuality be Christian?" Sure, you might find people suggesting that they're wrong in their views. You might even find those who suggest that those with a traditional view of sexuality aren't always acting Christ-like. But to actually come right out and question whether they're Christian at all? Not so much.
Sometimes, I worry that those kinds of discrepancies might get overlooked.
As always, so appreciate your input Jarred. You're quite right to essentially ask if generous spaciousness assumes all views to be equal (recognizing the even the notion of 'equal' can be considered in many complex ways).
ReplyDeleteGenerous spaciousness is not merely seeking to promote tolerance. And it isn't actually seeking to promote particular opinions about various views.... Rather it is seeking to promote a posture from which we can engage one another in the midst of those different views. Out of these postures, we can engage conversation about whether all views are equal, whether there are motivations or energy behind views that need to be challenged and addressed, whether a particular view dishonours and disrespects the inherent humanity of another, whether a particular view aims to be coercive of others etc. etc.
I don't think all views ought to be seen as equal and unthinkingly accepted as such. Rather, I think it is the responsibility of all of us to do our due diligence, to be critical thinkers, well-informed, and prepared to engage with intelligence as well as mutual respect and compassion.
It's difficult to be neither defensive nor offensive when others are doing plenty of fending of both varieties. In such situations, I find myself being silent a lot, but I hope someday to be able to articulate a non-combative contribution to heated discussions, the kind of contribution that makes people pause and think. I think you do this so well every time you post, so thank you.
ReplyDeleteThank you Emily - I appreciate that. Once we can learn to be a non-anxious presence, then we can have the presence of mind to not be distracted by the intensity of others' expectations - and simply stay centered on the foundational values that we hold for peace, unity and mutuality.
ReplyDeleteWow, Wendy! I could not agree more with John Smid. You've distinctly described my experience as well. Thank you for sharing. And thank you for standing in this tension and being a voice of grace.
ReplyDeleteLovely Wendy. I was at a meeting this weekend in LA and met a woman who co-authored "Collaboration Soup". It is an intentional plan to gather and listen and hear the commonalities and differences in a controlled platform. Forty minutes with her made a slight tweak to how I handle people. It is those slight tweaks, that make some people INTENSELY uncomfortable but, in the end, may help to find a place of grace and understanding for the whole.
ReplyDeleteI believe in Gods' Grace, and have experienced it throughout my 62 years of life! I also am a tolerent person, and love telling others of my Lord & Savior Jesus Christ, and the daily walk I have with Him!! "Generous Spaciousness" however, is weakening what the Bible says on the marriage union, as there can only be one acceptable marriage union before The Very Throne of God The Father in Heaven, and that has been ordained by God Himself,and that is between one man, and one woman!! All else falls short of Gods' standard as He has set up from the very beginning of the human race, and the creation of man in Genesis! I too hate to see gay individuals shamed for their choice in life, and God welcomes all into heaven who freely acknowledge that Jesus is Lord, accept Him as their Lord & Savior, repent from the sin in their lives that we are all guilty of, and follow the examples of guilt free living that has been so clearly set forth for us in The Bible!! It is so basic, and simple, and so very True!!
ReplyDeleteThere can be no other way than Gods' Way! It is wonderful to be a child of God, and live according to the clear cut principles that He has set forth for us to follow, and same-sex unions are not, nor will they ever be, acceptable to God, under any circumstances!!
ummm, Dan? Do you understand how confrontational, intolerant, and abusive you sound? Wendy's generous spaciousness makes room at the table for people like me who are pushed away from yours.
ReplyDeleteMy family is as sacred to me as yours is to you. I sincerely hope that your zeal for your faith does not lead you to make it legally difficult/impossible for me to provide for and protect my family the same as you do yours.