I thought it was time to write a slightly shorter, less
dense, lighter post than my last few series.
And as usual, a number of disparate things have been floating around in
my mind. So hopefully I’ll be able to
weave these various threads together into some kind of cohesive whole.
There has been some buzz today about Rob Bell articulating
his support, as many had assumed anyway, for gay marriage. Speaking at an Episcopal cathedral in San
Francisco Bell said, “"I am for
marriage. I am for fidelity. I am for love, whether it's a man and woman, a
woman and a woman, a man and a man. I think the ship has sailed and I think the
church needs -- I think this is the world we are living in and we need to
affirm people wherever they are."
Seeing various comments on
facebook, some expressed delight, some frustration that it took him so long,
some have dismissed him from evangelicalism, and some predicting a pathway to
the future of Christianity in the west.
Indeed, the range of these responses indicates just how much of a litmus
test this issue has become.
I am not gay. I will never know what it is like to feel
emotional, spiritual, romantic and physical attraction to other women. I will never know what it is like to open
your heart to the possibility of intimate, life-long love – taking the risk to
empty yourself on behalf of another, trusting the other to love you the best
they can, recognizing that such relational love is costly, demanding, and
lacking a guarantee of personal fulfillment – I’ll never know what it is like
to feel the possibility and potential of such love and know that people you
care about, who you worship with, who you grew up with, who you have served
believe that such love is an abomination, a threat to God’s intention for
family, the church, and society-at-large.
I’ll never really know what any of that feels like.
I’ll never know what it is like
to pour over the scriptures, deeply committed to being open to God’s will and
trying to discern what the good news of the gospel is for your life – when so
much of the church seems to have very little, if anything, good to say about
the way you love, who you love, and how you want to journey through life in
love.
But I do know what it is like
to be afraid of getting it wrong. I do know what it is like to be scared
of somehow disappointing God. I know what it is like to be a people pleaser to
try to avoid the rejection of others. I
know what it is like to work very hard at being a good Christian – only to find
that a life of striving burnt me out and made God seem very, very far
away. I know what it is to feel the
sting and hurt of others’ judgment. I
know what it is like to be considered a heretic, told I’m leading the church
astray, and accused of being demonized.
I know what it is like to feel alone, misunderstood, and
scared for the future.
And into the midst of all these experiences, I know what it
is to receive the compassion of God ….. and know I am called to do likewise in
extending compassion in mutual relationship with others.
I was in a thrift store the other day, one of my favorite
pastimes, and came across the book, “A Spirituality Named Compassion” by
Matthew Fox. I have been slowly
meandering through this book like one savors a delectable cheesecake. Fox reminds us that, “Compassion operates at
the same level as celebration because what is of most moment in compassion is
not feelings of pity but feelings of togetherness. It is this awareness of togetherness that
urges us to rejoice at another’s joy (celebration) and to grieve at another’s
sorrow. Both dimensions, celebration and
sorrow, are integral to true compassion.
And this, above all, separates pity from compassion for it is seldom
that we would invite someone we had pity on
to a common celebration. (Notice the
preposition on as in “patting one on
the head”) Yet the passion-with of true
compassion urges us to celebration.”
In the last year, I have had the opportunity to celebrate
with a number of my gay friends as they entered marriage covenants
together. Each ceremony was unique,
heart-felt, Christ-centered, and intimate.
My presence was not a political statement or doctrinal position. My presence was being with my friends in
their moments of celebration. My
presence was entering in to experience their leap of faith to commit their lives
to one another. My presence was an
expression of my love.
Latin American liberation theologian Jose Miranda says, “Love which is not an acute sense of justice and
an authentic suffering with-my-outraged-brother, such love does not transcend.
It is satisfied with itself although with its words it denies that it is so;
and thus it remains in itself and does not transcend." I want my expression of love to sing with
justice – not only the desire for all of my human brothers and sisters to
flourish – but the will to make it so. I
want my love to transcend beyond my own narcissistic individualism that can so
easily focus on merely what is good for “me and mine”. I want my love to reach to any fringe where
anyone experiences alienation from God and others to draw them in …. and that
means I will weep with those who weep, and I will rejoice with those who
rejoice. And I will trust the Holy
Spirit to lead all of us to righteousness, to repentance where needed, and to
maturity in our discipleship.
A good number of years ago, I was asked by a gay activist
whether or not I would attend a gay wedding of friends – and I replied that I
would and that I would bring a gift. That
comment led some to disown me as a ministry leader and to even question the
veracity of my Christian faith. Since then, New Direction has continued to
move into a place of generous spaciousness – that makes room for the diversity
in conviction of Christians on the question of gay marriage. In my wrestling with God and the text of Scripture,
this honouring of our common humanity as image-bearers of God, this
prioritizing of relationship and community, this commitment to humble listening
and engagement across difference, and this non-negotiable value of hospitality
for all and particularly those impoverished for any reason, smells more like
Jesus than dogmatic politicized, individualized expressions of black and white
certainty on moral questions that have no contextual mirror in the biblical
narrative.
But not everyone sees it that way.
One of the ways a sense of space can feel restricted is by
an exaggeration of pressure and suffering that those on the extreme ends of
this polarized matter express. I
recently saw a video of a ministry leader talking about an experience he had
with a panel – of which I was a member.
In the discussion that night, I was probably one of the more bold voices
challenging this leader to consider the implications and consequences of
certain philosophies and emphasis in his ministry network. My somewhat-out-of-character confrontational
approach that night had everything to do with justice and my sense of what was
humanizing and liberating for people based on my experiences in ex-gay ministry
and with many ex-gay survivors. For me,
it was my love in action. When I heard
this ministry leader recounting the experience you would have thought we had
all sharpened our pitchforks and were out for blood. But the confrontations that did occur weren’t
really about him – they were about justice for those who have felt driven to
suppression, denial, shame and repression.
We all like to have our ego’s stroked. And in the Christian community a great way to do that is to share stories of suffering “for the gospel”. But leaders need to have integrity. We need to be honest and resist the temptation to exaggerate to prove our own worth and effort. We need to live simply, humbly and rest in God’s grace.
I would be the first to say that this is hard. When you get a hateful email you want to tell
everyone so that they can reassure you, comfort you, and help take away the
sting. But this isn’t a justice-love
that transcends the self. When someone
from within the Body of Christ treats you like crap, you want to expose that
for the hypocrisy that it is. But that
isn’t a justice-love that transcends the self.
Resisting the lure to become political, to play the power
cards, to assert pressure to change …. none of this is easy. But it may be essential for those called to
long-term incarnational ministry.
Incarnational ministry means I am willing to be misunderstood – and not
tweet about it the minute it happens.
Incarnational ministry means I do my best to not take offense – when it
would feel so much better to vent and rant and rave and let everyone know just
how hard-done-by I am. Incarnational
ministry means that God’s grace is enough for me.
-wg

Wait, some are kicking Rob Bell over the evangelical tent over his support of gay marriage? Didn't most of them already kick him out due to his views on Hell? Just how many times can one person get kicked out of the evangelical tent?
ReplyDeleteWhich is my smartass way of suggesting that the even bigger problem within evangelicalism isn't the "gay" question, but the seemingly prevalent tendency of many evangelicals to fall into "Us vs. Them" thinking in general.
Rob Bell isn't in the Evangelical tent...he voluntarily left it a few years back, and he hasn't been invited back in, either. Authentic Heretics like him aren't. Which is good, and which is also why his views on "gay marriage" hold no weight in the Evangelical community. He's already understood to be a heretic. So if he can't get correct something as biblically basic as the teaching on the matter of hell and salvation, there's no illusion that he would get something like gay marriage correct, either. He willingly torched his own bridge to the Evangelical community years ago. He has no credibility anymore.
ReplyDeleteIt seems to me that there are people who love Jesus, who used to call themselves Evangelical but no longer do so, because to the world around that label means being narrow-minded, not open to listening let alone dialogue, anti-gay, and many other things that they do not wish to be part of. Like some of them, I also have "left the tent."
ReplyDeleteSo I am interested in what Rob Bell says and in the questions he asks. I am interested in reconsidering if the Bible says what we have been told it says. And in the midst of this, I love Jesus and want to love my neighbour fully, regardless of who they are, just because they are precious to God and created by Him.
I sometimes wonder whether a truer test of the validity of religious claims is their ability to withstand an evolution of understanding. F'rinstance - I'm an atheist, now, but I'm very much a product of my evangelical fundamentalist upbringing. So much of what I value and how I think I should treat others is deeply influenced by what I was taught decades ago. I'm emphatically not a Christian, yet I would be lying if I didn't describe my world view as somewhat "Christian-ish."
ReplyDeleteWhat strikes me as odd, as I reflect on it now, is that I don't think I personally would have felt the need to distinguish my outlook so specifically if Christianity hadn't itself been so vehement about asserting my non-Christian (or apostate, or unbelieving, or never-correctly-saved-in-the-first-place) status.
So here is Rob Bell, a product of Evangelicalism, whose outlook has evolved somewhat on certain doctrinal specifics (hell? no!) and he has come forward with compassionate statements on behalf of LGBTQ.
Does he still identify himself as Evangelical? Why shouldn't he? That portion of the Evangelical community that rejects him on the basis of adherence to rigid interpretations basically condemns itself to further and further social irrelevancy.
Personally, I'm not too fussed about the fate of sects that paint themselves into a corner - but I do care deeply about the harm they cause on the way.
Rob Bell is their child. So am I. We exist because of evangelicalism. We exist precisely because of the failings of evangelicalism. I just wish Evangelicals would get the message.
I notice something in this thread that is becoming more common: those who are anti-gay continue to throw their poison darts at others but they no longer print their real names, perhaps a sign that prejudice is too often called out for what it is. Those who are for welcoming gay people into the church and into our communities are far more likely to take the risk to speak up for compassion and justice.
ReplyDelete