Thursday, June 20, 2013

My Response to the Closing Down of Exodus

While I was away speaking to a group of largely conservative pastors and inviting them to consider the challenge and opportunity of generous spaciousness in their congregations, social media was a’buzz with the news that Exodus International is going to shut down.   I had read Alan Chambers’ apology yesterday.  But pretty typical for me, I was not at the forefront of this news.  New Direction has always, rather purposely, flown under the radar, focused on being faithful to carry out what God has asked us to do. 

None-the-less, this is pretty big news in our arena of engagement and some of you have indicated that you’d be intrigued to hear my thoughts.  So….. here goes:

From even before the time I spoke at the Exodus leadership conference in early 2008, I have prayed and deeply desired Exodus to truly experience that change is possible.  The kind of change I prayed for was a change of heart, a change of priority, a change of focus.  When I took my role as Exodus regional rep for Canada in, I believe, 2004 it was with the conviction that God was asking me to engage and that the time period would be three years.  It has always been my feeling that one should engage and seek to “be the change they long to see” rather than sitting and bitching from the outside. 

The truth is being a mainly straight Canadian female meant that I didn’t have a whole lot of influence in the large American evangelical system in which Exodus was birthed and sustained.  The address in 2008 was my swan song and not long after that we quietly withdrew from Exodus circles so that we could continue to press forward to listen and learn and stretch and be re-born into the postures of generous spaciousness.

After that keynote, I was asked to write a guest post for Ex-Gay Watch.  I decided to use the opportunity to articulate an apology to ex-gay survivors and other LGBT people who had been harmed negatively affected by the ex-gay paradigm.  I said that we weren’t going to be focused on reorientation change, that we had no clear idea about the causation of same-sex sexual orientation, and that we did not think that Christians who claimed to love gay people should be involved in political measures seeking to limit the rights and freedoms of others. 

If some of this is sounding a wee bit familiar ….. it does to me too.  I’ve been saying for a while now that Exodus seems to be taking some pages from New Direction’s playbook – only about six years later.  I don’t say that to boast or to take credit or to gloat or any such thing.  I am very aware that being a small organization in Canada and having a leader who did not have her personal life and testimony enmeshed in my leadership role afforded New Direction more nimbleness to respond sooner.  At the same time, we did pay a tremendous cost.  We lost, over the course of a few years, 50% of our donors.  There were some former board members who did not like the direction I was trying to go – resulting in some very difficult months when I didn’t know if I would be able to keep my position.  And, there were the emails – some threatening, some expressing disappointment, some accusing – from those who believed that I was no longer following God’s will.  Oh – and I got thrown under the bus in an article by Alan Chambers in Charisma.

So…. What do I think about Exodus’ announcement that it is shutting down?

When New Direction was going through the birth pangs of trying to move towards generous spaciousness, we had a very involved conversation as board and stakeholders about whether we should change the name of the organization and start over with a fresh, new blank page.  After all, here in Toronto, New Direction had that association with ex-gay – not a nice or easy legacy to navigate.  It would have been really nice to change the name, rebrand, and simply start over. 

In the end, we felt that it was very important to keep the name.  It has been hard.  I still meet gay people in Toronto whose first reaction is cynical and bitter when they hear that I lead New Direction.  But it has been richer too.  I get to hear the painful stories.  I get to be a humble ambassador of reconciliation.  I get to be a living apology.  And sometimes our biggest critics have become some of our biggest champions.  Read this letter from an ex-gay survivor that we feature on our corporate website.  For us, we needed to own our history.  We wanted to demonstrate that Christians do have the capacity to listen and to repent (change our minds).  We wanted to earn credibility and trust – not just expect it with a nice, clean slate.

I’m not sure that would work in the same way for Exodus.  So I’m not suggesting that they shouldn’t close down.  But, I do wonder if they simply re-open, with a new name, if there aren’t a few red flags for me.  When I wrote my apology for Ex-Gay Watch, New Direction still clearly held a traditional theological view of marriage.  What we found, however, was that the notion of building bridges while holding a clear position was a bit of an idealistic pipe-dream.  If we really wanted to nurture open and safe and spacious places for people to explore, wrestle, and ultimately own their own spiritual journey – we needed to relinquish our certainty – and acknowledge that Christians with deep commitment to Jesus Christ and to the Scriptures come to different conclusions on the question of whether a committed gay relationship can be an expression of faithful discipleship.  As leaders and as an organization – we had to relinquish power, control, status, privilege – and humble ourselves in the place of real tension – where we have to trust that the Holy Spirit is more than able to lead people in the way they need to go.  We don’t need to control the outcomes in people’s lives.  Our role is to enter mutual relationship with a commitment to keep looking to Jesus.

This has been liberating and challenging.  We do our very best to honour people where they are.  We do our best to listen to people’s convictions, values and beliefs with open hearts and minds – knowing that God can be trusted to lead and guide. 

I’m not saying that people cannot have a position.  Not at all.  People should be encouraged to work out their salvation with fear and trembling (ie. work at clarifying what they believe and why they believe it) all the while knowing that it is God who works in us to will and to act according to his good purpose.  But as an organization, and leaders within that organization, we want to be in the posture that allows people to wrestle with God.

Is there a need for an organization that holds a traditional view of marriage that seeks to be of support to same-sex attracted people?  Perhaps.  There are certainly same-sex attracted people with those convictions.  And it would certainly be wonderful for them to have support.  And it would certainly be good for those folks to move from the house of fear to the house of love.  So the idea of reducing fear may be a very important one.

Exodus, as an icon of an ex-gay paradigm that has been demonstrably harmful, closing down is a good thing.  Exodus reincarnated as some organization with a brand new name …… I’m not sure what I think about that. 

But this is what I think will be important:
  • ·         Absolute honesty and transparency about the connection to the legacy of Exodus
  • ·         Clear and honest messaging about the purpose, goals, and expected outcomes of the support and resources that are offered
  • ·         Ongoing work of being a living apology – being available to make amends and do the hard work of justice and reconciliation with ex-gay survivors
  • ·         Addressing the real issues surrounding ex-gay philosophies in our culture-at-large:  ie. holding the Restored Hope Network accountable for things that have been proven ineffective and harmful
  • ·         Speaking out for matters of justice, particularly in international contexts, for sexual and gender minority persons.
  • ·         Affirming the faith of gay Christians committed to Jesus Christ
  • ·         Acknowledging that theological differences about sexual morality are secondary issues – our reconciliation to God has been fully accomplished through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.


I would imagine that many who have had some connection with Exodus in the past may have mixed feelings about today’s announcement.  There has been a lot of hurt.  There have been times that trust has been broken.  It won’t be a smooth or easy ride for many to trust Alan or the board members – and some may never trust them.  This is a reality that Alan Chambers will need to face with patience, humility, perseverance and grace. 

If we serve a God who redeems, restores and reconciles, then we are called to be a people of hope and a people of faith.  Doesn’t mean we have to be stupid or have our eyes closed.  But it does mean that we also are called to patience, humility, perseverance and grace.


I, for one, will seek to live into those postures as I wait and see.  And in the meantime, I will continue to pray.  I will pray for the many ex-gay survivors.  I will pray for the many sexual minority young people in our churches.  I will pray for the broken relationships in families.  I will pray for wisdom, discernment, courage, and honesty.  And I will pray that God will keep my heart open, loving, and gracious as I place my trust in Christ alone.   

15 comments:

  1. Beautifully said. For now, I just want to comment on one of your points:

    Addressing the real issues surrounding ex-gay philosophies in our culture-at-large: ie. holding the Restored Hope Network accountable for things that have been proven ineffective and harmful

    Thank you so much for saying this and drawing attention to this. I think it's important to note that while Exodus may be shutting its doors, its legacy and the work it has done will continue through organizations like RHN, organizations that are building on the foundation laid by Exodus. One of my biggest concerns is that it doesn't seem right if Alan makes a one time apology and then everyone in charge at Exodus closes the doors, washes their hands, and walks away from their continuing legacy altogether. It seems to me that your suggestion that they hold RHN accountable in the ways you mention is entirely reasonable and necessary.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We wanted to demonstrate that Christians do have the capacity to listen and to repent (change our minds). We wanted to earn credibility and trust – not just expect it with a nice, clean slate.

    Great example of humility, Wendy.

    ..Lisa

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for this generous and thoughtful response. I was wondering what your (and/or New Directions') reaction would be. I especially appreciated your phrasing "from the house of fear to the house of love," one of my personal favourites from Henri Nouwen. A real challenge to make that move, but, as he says, the only move that ultimately gives us love-filled, Christ-following results.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am humbled and softened just reading Wendy's post and drawn to respect her leadership as the Holy Spirit confirms that this is the right spirit - the wisdom from above.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There has been a very interesting open-letter to Exodus posted today to the Huff-Post, by Christian blogger John Shore:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-shore/an-open-letter-to-exodus-internationals-super-remorseful-alan-chambers_b_3474493.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you everyone for your feedback. This has been a challenging time. My colleague Wes and I watched some clips from the Lisa Ling show (whole show airing tonight in Canada). It was raw and painful - and that was just a few clips.

    While I understand that Alan has a family to support - as I reflect more, I actually wish that he would step back, take a break, get a transition job to pay the bills, and give himself more time to reflect and process. John Shore's letter is more sarcastic and sharp than I am comfortable with .... but I think if Alan did take a break that would be important on several levels.

    It is no easy task to be in the world but not of the world. Our culture does not encourage humility. So I am deeply reminded of how much we all need grace. We all need God's mercy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have mixed feelings about John Shore's letter, myself. I'm also uncomfortable with his sharp tone and sarcastic nature. At the same time, I do appreciate his fierce advocacy of LGBT people. (Though I'll also not that he's not exactly a good friend to those who don't share his Christian faith, either.)

    Plus, I admit that after my own experience on Thursday, I appreciate John's letter for other reasons. On Thursday, I was part of a discussion where a lot of people -- including a number of cis heterosexual people, were doing the "Oh, we need to forgive him now." One even went so far as to claim that Alan has gone from "being an enemy to being an ally." (Helpful hint: If you're not a member of a marginalized group, bestowing ally status on someone else on their behalf is high on the list of Bad Ideas.) I objected to this, and explained that no, I do not consider Alan an ally now as I expect a lot more from someone actively seeking to be an ally. I also explained to this person that their lack of understanding of the whole story of Alan, Exodus, and their relationship to the LGBT community and how it has affected man of us is probably a strong reason why they might want to reconsider their attempts to play peacemaker in the situation (something they admitted they were trying). Another person chose to characterize my objections as "yelling at" the other person. (Note: Objections of and criticisms by marginalized people are often characterized this way. No matter how politely or rationally they are expressed.)

    So I guess as much as I'm uncomfortable with it, I also appreciate John Shore's letter because it gives me something to point to and say, "Oh no, honey. I'm not yelling at anybody. If you want an idea of what actual yelling might look like, check out what this guy has to say."

    ReplyDelete
  8. I can remember listening to a broadcast of your Exodus address in 2008 and thinking what a bombshell it was. I couldn't believe your courage. I wonder now, how that speech, that Reality Check, contributed to the current events.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Jarred - it is so important for you to articulate these things. Well meaning majority status folks can so easily wade into these complex realities and assume they know how to be supportive to minority persons .... and sometimes the truth is that they have no clue. The concept of ally will become meaningless if it is tossed around too easily - and so I value your pushback on the easy application.

    Don - I guess we'll never know - and that is ok. C.S. Lewis' definition of humility (which I love) is self-forgetfulness .... and that is how I want to live. The human heart is so easily insecure (I think mine especially) so it is easy to want to self-promote and draw attention .... and it is something I want to be really careful to avoid. In the big picture, so many people have tried to speak their truth with honesty and boldness. It is the survivors who have demonstrated profound courage - and I pray that it is their stories that will live long into the halls of history on this particular chapter of the beginning of dismantling ex-gay practices. These stories must continue to be heard loud and strong - especially as I think about the increasingly fundamental and shrill tone coming out of the Restored Hope Network. The idea that if someone is sexually immoral (in their estimation) that means they either were never a Christian or have backslidden to the point of grieving the Holy Spirit (losing their salvation) is an interpretation driven by control, fear and pride. I wonder how on earth David could have been a man after God's own heart if this idea was true? It seems to me to minimize the accomplished work of Christ that is more than able to envelop any human behaviour that falls short of God's best intentions. If this was not true every single Christian on planet earth would be foolish to have faith at all. In Jesus Christ's life, death and resurrection all that is messed up in the world is made right. The invitation to the human race is to live in this reality. To suggest it can be diminished because someone loves and is sexually intimate with someone of the same gender seems ludicrous to me in light of the immensity of all that Christ has accomplished. (I know that is a lot of Christianese for both of you, Jarred and Don, but hopefully it will be of some impact to Christians who feel pulled to the "radical" expectations of folks like those in RHN).

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Wendy,

    It's been somewhat of a roller-coaster ride for me, emotionally speaking. Hooray, it's shutting down, hooray, there's an apology, but...

    ...it doesn't really sound like the "what next" Alan Chambers is planning corresponds to the "what really ought to be next" if he is sincere about wanting to beginning to undo the harm he has done.

    Personally, I think he should take a decade-long vow of silence. I think he should make a daily practice of listening, without commentary, to the stories of LGBTQ people. I think he should be doing community service in any LGBTQ organization that will allow him to walk in their door - he should be scrubbing floors and listening. Maybe after 10 years of listening, not preaching and telling, he could craft an apology that doesn't include vague references to the contempt he still holds for us (and himself).

    I don't have a problem with John Shore's harshness toward Alan Chambers. I share the feeling. (Not so thrilled with John Shore's harshness toward my skepticism regarding his beliefs.) I think Dan Savage pretty much hit the nail on the head when he tweeted "Sorry is a nice, I guess, but it won't bring back the dead."

    Exodus needs to go. So does RHN. So does side B - and here is where I can't agree with you, Wendy. From where I sit, even though side B (I HATE that term) is something of a way-station between where I sit and the reparative therapists, I feel it still enables self-harm. Could I support someone choosing celibacy? Sure - but absolutely not if it is because they think their sexual orientation makes it a requirement.

    For me, the whole side B business is the gateway to the unending cycle of repression, denial, and misery that blossoms into the nightmare that was Exodus (and now RHN). For Chambers to hint at an involvement here suggests to me that he has NOT undergone any kind of significant shift... and that he is not to be trusted.

    He needs to take some time off, and he needs to get a good therapist (preferably NOT one from NARTH).

    ReplyDelete
  11. There's no doubt in my heart that the lack of "generous spaciousness" and a loving spirit in the church is what kept me and many other strugglers from disclosing our struggle from a fear of blanket condemnation. But I don't think God has redefined sexual purity based on commitment.
    Wendy commented, "that Christians with deep commitment to Jesus Christ and to the Scriptures come to different conclusions on the question of whether a committed gay relationship can be an expression of faithful discipleship."

    Our relativistic society has become quite adept at twisting meaning and denying anything that resembles absolutes or "commandments."

    Or perhaps redefining Leviticus 18:22 " 'Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable." and it's following prohibitions indicates that I could "redefine" and have a "committed" relationship with my mother or my dog?

    Wendy's right...it's not about controlling choices, but Christianity is about following the Lord Jesus and obeying his commands. End of story.

    Randall
    Out of homosexuality and upright sexually since 1989

    ReplyDelete
  12. and have a "committed" relationship with my mother or my dog?

    Your dog cannot consent. I find it detestable that you would make such a comparison in order to score rhetorical points.

    ReplyDelete

  13. Wow, this whole thing is mind boggling to me. Both New Direction and attending an amazing Exodus conference a few years ago have both been such refreshing and helpful ministries in my journey. Maybe I'm "out of the loop" but I think Exodus still did a lot of things right to help people. I certainly came away from their confernce enriched and empowered in my Christian walk.
    Also, I agree with Randall and his comments he has posted.
    I don't know, koodos to New Direction for your courage and care to minister to a group of people many Christians don't seek to help, but I can't bring myself to rejoice over the closure of Exodus. Obviously I have missed what was so "harmful" when I benefited so much from their minsitry.

    Richard

    ReplyDelete
  14. Richard,

    I can understand some of your dilemma as you process all of this. For those who are committed to fidelity in their marriage to an opposite gender spouse where absolute change of sexual orientation isn't the primary issue - but a healthy marriage is - aspects of Exodus offered support and encouragement.

    For those who were single and feeling like the only way they could be acceptable to God and other Christians was to become straight - the psychic and spiritual damage was often great. So as different people, with different journeys process these matters, it will be important that we listen deeply to one another's stories and extend a lot of grace in the recognition that different people have had different experiences.

    Personally, I think we also need to extend grace in the recognition that people are engaging the scriptures with a variety of interpretive lenses and this also requires humility and an ability to listen deeply. So in response to Randall, I would say that we may hold our convictions very deeply - but it is helpful to always remember than none of us are perfect interpreters of scripture. On any particular issue we could be wrong about our best reading and interpretation and subsequent convictions about scripture. That means that we navigate our faith with humility. It means we invite the Holy Spirit to keep on illuminating our path. And it means that we are careful to not make pronouncements about other people's convictions because they are expressed differently than our convictions. For Christians, it is perhaps helpful to remember that the first statement of faith was simply, "Jesus is Lord". This was a deeply subversive statement in the midst of the Roman Empire - but it was not a statement about a particular moral code or expression of holiness. Scripture invites us to live in alignment with our conscience - and so we might do well to remember that we are not invited to control other people's consciences. Rather, we are to, "Do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with our God."

    ReplyDelete